Re: ICANN registrar supporting v6 glue?

[JAKO Andras <jako.andras () eik bme hu>]

> ;.                              IN      NS
> A.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.     3600000 IN      A       198.41.0.4
> B.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.     3600000 IN      A       192.228.79.201
> C.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.     3600000 IN      A       192.33.4.12
> D.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.     3600000 IN      A       128.8.10.90
> E.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.     3600000 IN      A       192.203.230.10
> F.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.     3600000 IN      A       192.5.5.241
> G.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.     3600000 IN      A       192.112.36.4
> H.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.     3600000 IN      A       128.63.2.53
> I.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.     3600000 IN      A       192.36.148.17
> J.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.     3600000 IN      A       192.58.128.30
> K.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.     3600000 IN      A       193.0.14.129
> L.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.     3600000 IN      A       198.32.64.12
> M.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.     3600000 IN      A       202.12.27.33
>
>
> I don't see any v6 glue there...  Rather than having conversations about
> transition to IPv6, maybe we should be sure it works natively first?  It's
> rather ironic to think that for v6 DNS to work an incumbent legacy protocol is
> still required.

At least something is happening:

http://www.icann.org/committees/security/sac016.htm
http://www.icann.org/committees/security/sac017.htm

Regards,
Andras