nanog mailing list archives

Re: IPv6 transition work was RE: NANOG 40 agenda posted


From: matthew zeier <mrz () velvet org>
Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 22:58:37 -0700




John Curran wrote:

Best of luck with it; load-balancers aren't generally hiding
in ISP's backbones and it hasn't been major revenue for
the traditional router crowd.   Net result is there hasn't
been much IPv6 attention in that market...

I suppose, but certain places like Mozilla, would be dead in the water without load balancers. Citrix got their act together and shipped 8.0 with v6 vips on the front talking to v4 servers on the backend.

Rock on Citrix.


Current thread: