nanog mailing list archives
Re: Question on 7.0.0.0/8
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch () muada com>
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 02:36:40 +0200
On 15-apr-2007, at 0:49, Florian Weimer wrote:
Ok, I wasn't clear: the problem here is that both ARIN and RIPE claim net 25.0.0.0/8 as "their own".
This is pretty standard for European /8. 53/8 is yet another example
Interesting, the 53 net is also in both whois databases. However, the 25 net is the only one that both RIRs claim in their delegation records available from the FTP servers.
Current thread:
- Question on 7.0.0.0/8 william(at)elan.net (Apr 13)
- Re: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 Jon R. Kibler (Apr 13)
- Re: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 william(at)elan.net (Apr 14)
- Re: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 Adrian Chadd (Apr 14)
- Re: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 Iljitsch van Beijnum (Apr 14)
- Re: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 Alexander Harrowell (Apr 14)
- Re: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 Iljitsch van Beijnum (Apr 14)
- Re: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 Florian Weimer (Apr 14)
- Re: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 Iljitsch van Beijnum (Apr 14)
- RE: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 michael.dillon (Apr 15)
- Re: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 Roland Dobbins (Apr 15)
- RE: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 Jim Popovitch (Apr 15)
- RE: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 Sean Donelan (Apr 15)
- RE: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 Chris L. Morrow (Apr 15)
- RE: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 william(at)elan.net (Apr 15)
- Re: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 william(at)elan.net (Apr 14)
- RE: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 alex (Apr 15)
- RE: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 michael.dillon (Apr 16)
- Re: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 Jon R. Kibler (Apr 13)
- RE: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 william(at)elan.net (Apr 15)
- RE: Question on 7.0.0.0/8 michael.dillon (Apr 16)