nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 daydreams
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 23:08:49 -1000
If we're going to do that, we may as well also start reclaiming those 48 bit MAC addresses that come with ethernet cards. After all, nobody would need anymore than say 12 to 13 bits to address their LANs.
so you think that layer-2 lans scale well above 12-13 bits? which ones in particular? randy
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 daydreams, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 daydreams Randy Bush (Oct 16)
- Re: IPv6 daydreams Randy Bush (Oct 16)
- Re: IPv6 daydreams bmanning (Oct 16)
- Re: IPv6 daydreams Randy Bush (Oct 16)
- Re: IPv6 daydreams Suresh Ramasubramanian (Oct 16)
- Re: IPv6 daydreams Jeroen Massar (Oct 17)
- Re: IPv6 daydreams Peter Dambier (Oct 17)
- Re: IPv6 daydreams Paul G (Oct 17)
- Message not available
- Re: IPv6 daydreams Peter Dambier (Oct 17)
- Re: IPv6 daydreams Mark Smith (Oct 17)
- Re: IPv6 daydreams Randy Bush (Oct 17)
- Re: IPv6 daydreams Mark Smith (Oct 17)
- Re: IPv6 daydreams Kevin Loch (Oct 17)
- Re: IPv6 daydreams David Barak (Oct 17)
- Re: IPv6 daydreams Jeroen Massar (Oct 17)
- Re: IPv6 daydreams Paul Jakma (Oct 17)
- Re: IPv6 daydreams David Conrad (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 daydreams David Barak (Oct 19)
- Re: IPv6 news Michael . Dillon (Oct 17)