nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 daydreams
From: bmanning () vacation karoshi com
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 03:41:23 +0000
On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 05:20:12PM -1000, Randy Bush wrote:
Okay, I'll bite - If I were king, here's what I'd want to see:[ changes to current policies, not architecture, elided ] let's first agree on some goals o really big address space, not the v6 fixed 32 bit limited game. (old dogs will now bay for variable length, aroooooo!)
woof!
o a routing system which has the ability to scale really well in the presence of fewer and fewer nodes (think sites) where out-degree == 1
sure... maybe. is there the presumption of e2e here?
o mobility
process mobility? latency tolerent? any distinction btwn individual nodes or whole networks? need clarity here.
o really scalable v4 backward compatibility so that we don't have the end-user-affecting mess which looms in a few years
well... not so sure about this one. why do we care?
anything else? randy
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 news, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 news Jared Mauch (Oct 15)
- Re: IPv6 news Brandon Butterworth (Oct 15)
- Re: IPv6 news John Reilly (Oct 16)
- Re: IPv6 news Joe Abley (Oct 16)
- Re: IPv6 news John Reilly (Oct 16)
- Re: IPv6 news Joe Abley (Oct 16)
- Re: IPv6 news Randy Bush (Oct 16)
- IPv6 daydreams David Barak (Oct 16)
- Re: IPv6 daydreams Randy Bush (Oct 16)
- Re: IPv6 daydreams Randy Bush (Oct 16)
- Re: IPv6 daydreams bmanning (Oct 16)
- Re: IPv6 daydreams Randy Bush (Oct 16)
- Re: IPv6 news Joe Abley (Oct 16)
- Re: IPv6 daydreams Suresh Ramasubramanian (Oct 16)
- Re: IPv6 daydreams Jeroen Massar (Oct 17)
- Re: IPv6 daydreams Peter Dambier (Oct 17)
- Re: IPv6 daydreams Paul G (Oct 17)
- Message not available
- Re: IPv6 daydreams Peter Dambier (Oct 17)
- Re: IPv6 daydreams Mark Smith (Oct 17)
- Re: IPv6 daydreams Randy Bush (Oct 17)
- Re: IPv6 daydreams Mark Smith (Oct 17)
- Re: IPv6 daydreams Kevin Loch (Oct 17)