nanog mailing list archives

Re: IAB and "private" numbering


From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb () cs columbia edu>
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 14:34:07 -0500


In message <4377924E.109 () peter-dambier de>, Peter Dambier writes:

Christopher L. Morrow wrote:

...

I don't believe there is a 'rfc1918' in v6 (yet), I agree that it doesn't
seem relevant, damaging perhaps though :)


Yes, there was rfc1918 in IPv6 right from the beginning:

Site local addresses "0xF80" dont leave a site. They can be routed within
a site but they never get outside. Just like rfc1918 addresses do.


Yes, and site-local addresses have been removed from the spec, because 
of the many problems they cause.

                --Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb



Current thread: