nanog mailing list archives
Re: IAB and "private" numbering
From: Peter Dambier <peter () peter-dambier de>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 23:14:15 +0100
Sorry, I have been daydreaming :) But waking up is a nightmare too: Getting rid of all those locally administered addresses. Looks like it has taken me back to IPv4 for some time. There should never have been rfc1918 in the first place nor NAT either. Regards, Peter Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
In message <4377924E.109 () peter-dambier de>, Peter Dambier writes:Christopher L. Morrow wrote: ...I don't believe there is a 'rfc1918' in v6 (yet), I agree that it doesn't seem relevant, damaging perhaps though :)Yes, there was rfc1918 in IPv6 right from the beginning: Site local addresses "0xF80" dont leave a site. They can be routed within a site but they never get outside. Just like rfc1918 addresses do.Yes, and site-local addresses have been removed from the spec, because of the many problems they cause.--Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
-- Peter and Karin Dambier The Public-Root Consortium Graeffstrasse 14 D-64646 Heppenheim +49(6252)671-788 (Telekom) +49(179)108-3978 (O2 Genion) +49(6252)750-308 (VoIP: sipgate.de) mail: peter () peter-dambier de mail: peter () echnaton serveftp com http://iason.site.voila.fr http://www.kokoom.com/iason
Current thread:
- Re: IAB and "private" numbering, (continued)
- Re: IAB and "private" numbering Geoff Huston (Nov 13)
- Re: IAB and "private" numbering Michael . Dillon (Nov 14)
- Message not available
- Re: IAB and "private" numbering Christopher L. Morrow (Nov 12)
- Re: IAB and "private" numbering bmanning (Nov 12)
- Re: IAB and "private" numbering Mark Smith (Nov 12)
- Re: IAB and "private" numbering Christopher L. Morrow (Nov 12)
- Message not available
- Re: IAB and "private" numbering Christopher L. Morrow (Nov 12)
- Re: IAB and "private" numbering Geoff Huston (Nov 13)
- Re: IAB and "private" numbering Peter Dambier (Nov 13)
- Re: IAB and "private" numbering Steven M. Bellovin (Nov 13)
- Re: IAB and "private" numbering Peter Dambier (Nov 14)
- Re: IAB and "private" numbering David Conrad (Nov 15)
- Re: IAB and "private" numbering Geoff Huston (Nov 15)
- Re: IAB and "private" numbering Tony Tauber (Nov 14)
- Re: IAB and "private" numbering Mark Smith (Nov 14)
- Re: IAB and "private" numbering Daniel Karrenberg (Nov 17)
- Re: IAB and "private" numbering Mark Smith (Nov 17)