nanog mailing list archives
Re: sorbs.net
From: Robert Bonomi <bonomi () mail r-bonomi com>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 13:10:30 -0600 (CST)
From owner-nanog () merit edu Tue Mar 15 12:53:30 2005 Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 10:53:22 -0800 From: Micah McNelly <micah () style net> Subject: Re: sorbs.net Actually I got a response quickly from a list member who represent sorbs at some level. Do you really think opinion has a place in mail delivery?
*MY* opinion on that matter doesn't count for sh*t. Neither does yours. The _only_ opinion that matters is that of the *owner* of the destination mail-server. As in "My server, *my* rules." Quite obviously, the server operator at the place you were trying to mail _to_ *DOES* believe that 'opinion' has a place in e-mail delivery. Like I said, the _first_ place you should take your 'problem' is to *them*. *NOBODY* is 'forced' to use SORBS, or any othe blocklist. The mail-system owners/administrators that *CHOOSE* to do so, have made a voluntary decision to restrict incoming mail to their system on that basis. THEY did it, nobody else.
Current thread:
- Re: sorbs.net, (continued)
- Re: sorbs.net Micah McNelly (Mar 15)
- Re: sorbs.net Dave Dennis (Mar 15)
- Re: sorbs.net Steve Gibbard (Mar 15)
- Re: sorbs.net Dan Hollis (Mar 15)
- Re: sorbs.net Michael . Dillon (Mar 16)
- Re: sorbs.net Jay Hennigan (Mar 16)
- Re: sorbs.net Micah McNelly (Mar 15)
- Re: sorbs.net Bruce Campbell (Mar 15)
- Re: sorbs.net Paul G (Mar 15)
- Re: sorbs.net Randy Bush (Mar 15)
- Re: sorbs.net Rich Kulawiec (Mar 15)
- Re: sorbs.net Paul G (Mar 15)
- Re: sorbs.net Rich Kulawiec (Mar 15)
- Re: sorbs.net Jason Slagle (Mar 21)
- Message not available
- Re: sorbs.net Jay R. Ashworth (Mar 21)
- Re: sorbs.net Suresh Ramasubramanian (Mar 21)
- Re: sorbs.net Michael . Dillon (Mar 22)
- Re: sorbs.net Jay R. Ashworth (Mar 22)
- Re: sorbs.net Michael . Dillon (Mar 22)