nanog mailing list archives
Re: sorbs.net
From: Dave Dennis <dmd () speakeasy org>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 10:57:28 -0800 (PST)
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, Micah McNelly wrote:
Actually I got a response quickly from a list member who represent sorbs at some level. Do you really think opinion has a place in mail delivery? What if the USPS decided any magazine you subscribed to was suddenly unfit for delivery and decided it should blocked (thrown away)? /m
Well, anyone remember the Comstock Act? But seriously, the analogy here is a bit false. It would be like the recipient of the mail signed up to use a service that inspected their mail for them, and made the decisions you are describing. You can argue that signing up for such a service is silly, wrong headed, ill informed and results in unintended consequences. But you cannot argue that it is government censorship. +------------------------- + Dave Dennis + Seattle, WA + dmd () speakeasy org + http://www.dmdennis.com +-------------------------
Current thread:
- sorbs.net Micah McNelly (Mar 15)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: sorbs.net Hannigan, Martin (Mar 15)
- Re: sorbs.net Gadi Evron (Mar 15)
- Re: sorbs.net Jerry Pasker (Mar 15)
- Re: sorbs.net Paul G (Mar 15)
- Re: sorbs.net Steve Sobol (Mar 16)
- Re: sorbs.net Gadi Evron (Mar 15)
- Re: sorbs.net Robert Bonomi (Mar 15)
- Re: sorbs.net Micah McNelly (Mar 15)
- Re: sorbs.net Dave Dennis (Mar 15)
- Re: sorbs.net Steve Gibbard (Mar 15)
- Re: sorbs.net Dan Hollis (Mar 15)
- Re: sorbs.net Michael . Dillon (Mar 16)
- Re: sorbs.net Jay Hennigan (Mar 16)
- Re: sorbs.net Micah McNelly (Mar 15)
- Re: sorbs.net Bruce Campbell (Mar 15)
- Re: sorbs.net Paul G (Mar 15)
- Re: sorbs.net Randy Bush (Mar 15)