nanog mailing list archives
Re: Association of Trustworthy Roots?
From: Paul Vixie <vixie () vix com>
Date: 18 Jan 2005 17:05:43 +0000
It isn't just that the root operators are silent.
wrt the panix debacle, why wouldn't the root operators have been silent? the root zone was continuously available from all published servers with excellent rtt, no measurable congestion, no inconsistencies, and up-to-date serial numbers. under those conditions, root operators will be silent. -- Paul Vixie
Current thread:
- Re: panix hijack press, (continued)
- Re: panix hijack press Thornton (Jan 20)
- Re: panix hijack press Matthew Sullivan (Jan 21)
- Re: panix hijack press David Lesher (Jan 20)
- Re: Association of Trustworthy Roots? gnulinux (Jan 16)
- Re: Association of Trustworthy Roots? John Palmer (NANOG Acct) (Jan 16)
- Re: Association of Trustworthy Roots? gnulinux (Jan 16)
- Re: Association of Trustworthy Roots? John Palmer (NANOG Acct) (Jan 16)
- Re: Association of Trustworthy Roots? Todd Vierling (Jan 17)
- Re: Association of Trustworthy Roots? Paul Vixie (Jan 19)
- Re: Association of Trustworthy Roots? Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Jan 19)
- Re: Association of Trustworthy Roots? Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Jan 16)
- Re: Association of Trustworthy Roots? Christopher L. Morrow (Jan 16)
- Re: Association of Trustworthy Roots? Chris Adams (Jan 16)
- Re: Association of Trustworthy Roots? Christopher L. Morrow (Jan 16)
- Re: Association of Trustworthy Roots? William Allen Simpson (Jan 16)
- Re: Association of Trustworthy Roots? Joshua Brady (Jan 16)
- Re: Association of Trustworthy Roots? Christopher L. Morrow (Jan 16)