nanog mailing list archives
Re: panix hijack press
From: Thornton <thornton-nanog () cierragroup com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 19:56:57 -0700
Upon what verifiable facts do you base your endless speculation? (1) Stop blaming the victim! (2) Registrants can't "lock" domains, it's a registrar-lock. Users can only ask that domains be locked. Stupid policy, bad results. (3) This is a red-herring issue anyway, since there is no evidence that Mel-IT ever sent notification, or even waited 5 days for a response. The domain was hijacked in the middle of the night, in the middle of a weekend -- a very odd time for confirming responses by a staff that wasn't in the office answering the phones.... (4) Mel-IT has admitted it "failed to properly confirm", and a "loophole" caused the error. (5) Mel-IT has an executive and a lawyer that were both notified about the problem, and refused to mitigate the damage. (6) Stop blaming the victim!
i dont think anyone is blaming the victim...what evidence do you have to support the domain being locked? a user can lock a domain..they can login to the control panel for there registrar and select registrar lock, registrar-lock, or lock and i am sure there are other registrars that word it even differently. once you select that it effectively locks your domain so it cant be transfered.
Current thread:
- Re: panix hijack press, (continued)
- Re: panix hijack press Dan Hollis (Jan 20)
- Re: panix hijack press Thornton (Jan 20)
- Re: panix hijack press William Allen Simpson (Jan 20)
- Re: panix hijack press Mark Jeftovic (Jan 20)
- Re: panix hijack press William Allen Simpson (Jan 20)
- Re: panix hijack press William Allen Simpson (Jan 20)
- Re: panix hijack press Thornton (Jan 20)
- Re: panix hijack press Richard Parker (Jan 20)
- Re: panix hijack press William Allen Simpson (Jan 20)
- Enough. (was Re: panix hijack press) Steve Gibbard (Jan 20)
- Re: panix hijack press Thornton (Jan 20)
- Re: panix hijack press Matthew Sullivan (Jan 21)
- Re: panix hijack press David Lesher (Jan 20)
- Re: Association of Trustworthy Roots? John Palmer (NANOG Acct) (Jan 16)
- Re: Association of Trustworthy Roots? gnulinux (Jan 16)
- Re: Association of Trustworthy Roots? John Palmer (NANOG Acct) (Jan 16)
- Re: Association of Trustworthy Roots? Paul Vixie (Jan 19)