RE: Panix.com should be back.

["Hannigan, Martin" <hannigan () verisign com>]

And to think I went to college. Even. Folks, 'Blackberry Gone Wild'.
Usually a great device, but tremendously beat and now showing it.

That should simply read 'Thanks Farid'. The thing went
wild storing keystrokes like it was hung, autocompleting, and
sending everywhere. Twice here and to many people on in the addr
book privately. Mea Culpa.



--
Martin Hannigan                         (c) 617-388-2663
VeriSign, Inc.                          (w) 703-948-7018
Network Engineer IV                       Operations & Infrastructure
hannigan () verisign com



> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu]On Behalf Of
> Hannigan, Martin
> Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2005 11:01 PM
> To: MajidFarid () TelecomOttawa com; nanog () merit edu
> Subject: Re: Panix.com should be back.
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks Fared for your assistance. Ypu are great among a bun
> ---
> Martin Hannigan
> hannigan () verisign com
> Verisign, Inc.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-nanog () merit edu <owner-nanog () merit edu>
> To: nanog list <nanog () merit edu>
> Sent: Sun Jan 16 19:57:54 2005
> Subject: Panix.com should be back.
>
>
> I see that DNS changes has been reverted
> http://www.dnsreport.com/tools/dnsreport.ch?domain=panix.com
>
> I have also contacted our Customer owner of ns1.ukdnsservers.co.uk
> [panix.com] (142.46.200.67) they have assured me they will remove the
> DNS config as well. 
>
>
> Sorry for the last response I was away for weekend. 
>
> --
> Majid Farid
> Telecom Ottawa Limited.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu] On 
> Behalf Of
> Gadi Evron
> Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2005 7:24 PM
> To: nanog list
> Subject: domain hijacking - what do you do to prepared?
>
>
> Until today, I considered this to be a real and relevant threat, 
> although rather low in my matrix.
>
> As someone I know said today, now that kiddies saw how much 
> "fun" this 
> is, I am sure they will attempt this again.
>
> The question that comes to mind is - what do you do to be prepared?
>
> I suppose that other than setting registrar lock in place, there is 
> another thing one can do.
>
> Study!
>
> Whether it's checking the expiration date for your domain, 
> establishing 
> contact with your up-in-line authority - registrar, tld, etc. 
> depending 
> on who you are.
> Having the relevant contact information at hand, establishing a set 
> policy on how to handle such an incident and who to contact, bugging 
> your next-in-chain about setting a policy on this with you, 
> as well as 
> setting such a policy for those who are slaves to you.
>
> That said, all that is left now is to see how this happened 
> (so that it 
> won't happen again - just killing a fire doesn't mean it won't be 
> re-ignited) and perhaps think a bit on how we do things - which I am 
> sure many will now do.
>
> Maybe this can be another discussion issue for the next NANOG 
> get-together as well?
>
>       Gadi.