nanog mailing list archives
Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]
From: Niels Bakker <niels=nanog () bakker net>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 10:13:47 +0100
Thus spake "Paul Vixie" <paul () vix com>if arin's allocation policy for ipv6 does not take account of multihomed non-allocating enterprises then either that policy will change, or the internet exchange point business model will be dead.
* stephen () sprunk org (Stephen Sprunk) [Fri 19 Nov 2004, 05:44 CET]:
I don't understand why exchanges would suffer; the real threat is that enterprises simply won't use IPv6 until IPv4 space is completely exhausted -- and perhaps even after it is.
Making it hard to multihome by not providing assignments to companies that used to be able to get such will decrease the usefulness of exchange points for those. Of course, nothing stops them from announcing their /48's PA assignments but the risk of those getting filtered by "real" ISPs is very real. It seems the lack of PI increases the amount of "have-nots" in an IPv6 world compared to IPv4. -- Niels.
Current thread:
- Re: MTU (was Re: ULA and RIR cost-recovery), (continued)
- Re: MTU (was Re: ULA and RIR cost-recovery) Bill Owens (Nov 25)
- Re: ULA and RIR cost-recovery Stephen Sprunk (Nov 25)
- Re: ULA and RIR cost-recovery Owen DeLong (Nov 26)
- Re: ULA and RIR cost-recovery Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 24)
- Re: ULA and RIR cost-recovery Daniel Senie (Nov 24)
- Re: ULA and RIR cost-recovery Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 25)
- Re: ULA and RIR cost-recovery Daniel Senie (Nov 26)
- Re: ULA and RIR cost-recovery Owen DeLong (Nov 26)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Iljitsch van Beijnum (Nov 20)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Stephen Sprunk (Nov 20)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Niels Bakker (Nov 19)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Iljitsch van Beijnum (Nov 19)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Christian Kuhtz (Nov 19)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Iljitsch van Beijnum (Nov 20)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Stephen Sprunk (Nov 19)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Christian Kuhtz (Nov 19)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Kevin Loch (Nov 19)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Paul Vixie (Nov 19)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Kevin Loch (Nov 19)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Paul Vixie (Nov 19)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Stephen Sprunk (Nov 20)