nanog mailing list archives
Re: EFF whitepaper
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <suresh () outblaze com>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 19:42:33 +0530
Paul G wrote:
with that said, this is quite possibly off-topic to nanog. i'd second the request earlier in the thread to move it to somewhere more appropriate.
politechbot for instance .. lovely place to discuss this sort of thing. http://seclists.org/lists/politech/2004/Nov/0026.html -- suresh ramasubramanian suresh () outblaze com gpg # EDEDEFB9 manager, security & antispam operations, outblaze limited
Current thread:
- Re: EFF whitepaper, (continued)
- Re: EFF whitepaper Steven Champeon (Nov 15)
- Re: EFF whitepaper J.D. Falk (Nov 15)
- Re: EFF whitepaper Tom (UnitedLayer) (Nov 15)
- Re: EFF whitepaper Steven Champeon (Nov 15)
- Re: EFF whitepaper Tom (UnitedLayer) (Nov 15)
- Re: EFF whitepaper Patrick W Gilmore (Nov 15)
- Re: EFF whitepaper Steven Champeon (Nov 15)
- Staying on topic (was Re: EFF whitepaper) Steve Gibbard (Nov 15)
- Re: EFF whitepaper Rich Kulawiec (Nov 16)
- Re: EFF whitepaper Paul G (Nov 16)
- Re: EFF whitepaper Suresh Ramasubramanian (Nov 16)
- Re: EFF whitepaper Steven Champeon (Nov 15)
- Re: EFF whitepaper Richard Welty (Nov 15)
- Re: EFF whitepaper J.D. Falk (Nov 17)