nanog mailing list archives

Re: EFF whitepaper


From: Steven Champeon <schampeo () hesketh com>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 11:01:08 -0500


on Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 04:45:24AM +0000, Paul Vixie wrote:

sean () donelan com (Sean Donelan) writes:

http://www.eff.org/wp/?f=SpamCollateralDamage.html

excerpt:

        I. The Problem   

        MoveOn.org is a politically progressive organization that engages
        in online activism. For the most part, its work consists of sending
        out action alerts to its members via email lists.  Often, these
        alerts will ask subscribers to send letters to their
        representatives about time-sensitive issues, or provide details
        about upcoming political events. Although people on the MoveOn.org
        email lists have specifically requested to receive these alerts,
        many large ISPs regularly block them because they assume bulk email
        is spam. [...]

i reject all mail from moveon.org here.  not because i assume bulk e-mail
is spam, but because i still personally receive all mail sent to any address
at cix.net, and quite a few people who wish to subscribe from cox.net end
up typing cix.net by mistake.  ("i" and "o" are adjacent in QWERTYland.)
i'm therefore in a position to prove that moveon.org does not verify the
ownership or permission status of new e-mail addresses before sending
political information.  i tried complaining, but moveon.org's postmaster
function appeared to be understaffed or overworked or both.

I couldn't agree more. We have several users here who signed up for the
moveon.org mailings back when the group was a single-issue activism project
(getting the US to "move on" and stop wasting its time trying to impeach
Clinton). None of them expected to become permanent members of what soon
became a shrill, extremely partisan, and spam-spewing group. To the best of
my knowledge, no attempt to unsubscribe has been respected.
 
That said, I've long since stopped listening (or contributing) to the EFF
as I see their war on antispammers as counterproductive. John Gilmore runs
a well-known open relay at toad.com, and for some reason thinks that free,
anonymous speech is important enough to let spammers drown it out through
sheer volume. I prefer having usable email, so I no longer support the EFF.

-- 
join us!   http://hesketh.com/about/careers/web_designer.html       join us! 
hesketh.com/inc. v: +1(919)834-2552 f: +1(919)834-2554 w: http://hesketh.com
join us!   http://hesketh.com/about/careers/account_manager.html    join us!


Current thread: