Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]

[Jared Mauch <jared () puck nether net>]

On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 09:29:25AM -0500, Christian Kuhtz wrote:
> On 11/15/04 12:18 AM, "Daniel Roesen" <dr () cluenet de> wrote:
>
> > Unfortunate, even today there are not many option of transit ISPs
> > who have a real native dual-stack deployment (I consider 6PE to be
> > native)... most have just tunnels inside. Currently I cannot think
> > of more than... hm... 3-4 ISPs who can deliver real amounts of
> > native US-EU bandwidth.
>
> What sort of customers do these v6 SP's have for IPv6?  What demands are
> there for real amounts of IPv6 bandwidth?

        I've historically found that there are a number of FTP
sites that get congested on IPv4 but are accessable via IPv6 (only).

        I have a /48 at home, but am only using about 4 /64's on my various
subnets (servers, wireless, office lan, etc..)

        I'd say that about 1-5% of my home bandwidth usage (on average)
is IPv6 only.  I'm sure it's going up with the number of sites doing
v4+v6 (eg: roots) increasing.

        - jared

-- 
Jared Mauch  | pgp key available via finger from jared () puck nether net
clue++;      | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/  My statements are only mine.