nanog mailing list archives
Re: Charter blocking Port 25
From: John Payne <john () sackheads org>
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2004 23:28:20 -0400
--On Wednesday, June 9, 2004 8:03 PM -0700 matthew zeier <mrz () velvet org> wrote:
In reality this isn't a problem for me but it is for those who don't know how to configure their mail readers for a different outbound port.
A common counter argument is that those are the people who probably shouldn't have unfettered port 25 access.
However, I think this is time for my "spam-l is two folders over" comment
Current thread:
- Re: NLB Recommendations, (continued)
- Re: NLB Recommendations Keith Washington (Jun 09)
- Charter blocking Port 25 Arman (Jun 09)
- Re: Charter blocking Port 25 Matthew McGehrin (Jun 09)
- Re: Charter blocking Port 25 Deepak Jain (Jun 09)
- Re: Charter blocking Port 25 W. Mark Herrick, Jr. (Jun 09)
- Re: Charter blocking Port 25 Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy (Jun 09)
- Re: Charter blocking Port 25 Richard Parker (Jun 09)
- Re: Charter blocking Port 25 Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy (Jun 10)
- Re: Charter blocking Port 25 J.D. Falk (Jun 09)
- Re: Charter blocking Port 25 matthew zeier (Jun 09)
- Re: Charter blocking Port 25 John Payne (Jun 09)
- Re: Charter blocking Port 25 Todd Vierling (Jun 10)
- Re: Charter blocking Port 25 Jeroen Massar (Jun 10)
- Re: Charter blocking Port 25 Todd Vierling (Jun 10)
- Re: Charter blocking Port 25 Michael Loftis (Jun 09)
- Re: Charter blocking Port 25 Henning Brauer (Jun 10)
- Re: Charter blocking Port 25 Konstantin Barinov (Jun 10)