nanog mailing list archives
Re: [OT] Re: Banned on NANOG
From: "Paul G" <paul () rusko us>
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2004 09:30:55 -0500
----- Original Message ----- From: "Patrick W Gilmore" <patrick () ianai net> To: <nanog () merit edu> Cc: "Patrick W Gilmore" <patrick () ianai net> Sent: Saturday, December 04, 2004 8:50 AM Subject: Re: [OT] Re: Banned on NANOG
On Dec 3, 2004, at 8:41 PM, Paul Vixie wrote:alex () nac net (Alex Rubenstein) writes:... I think we all agree that RAS and Randy don't fall into the above category of having to be gotten ridden of. ...nope.Perhaps the fact that even some of the longest standing, most respected, "clueful" members of the list cannot agree on such things proves that a non-technical administrator with no operational experience has no chance of correctly concluding which people "fall into the above category"?
or that regardless of who makes the conclusion, it is likely to be subjective and meet disagreement from some folks on the list. p --- paul galynin
Current thread:
- RE: [OT] Re: Banned on NANOG Joe Johnson (Dec 02)
- RE: [OT] Re: Banned on NANOG william(at)elan.net (Dec 02)
- RE: [OT] Re: Banned on NANOG Alex Rubenstein (Dec 02)
- Re: [OT] Re: Banned on NANOG JC Dill (Dec 02)
- Re: [OT] Re: Banned on NANOG Paul Vixie (Dec 03)
- Re: [OT] Re: Banned on NANOG Patrick W Gilmore (Dec 04)
- Re: [OT] Re: Banned on NANOG Paul G (Dec 04)
- Re: [OT] Re: Banned on NANOG Paul Vixie (Dec 04)
- Re: [OT] Re: Banned on NANOG Alex Bligh (Dec 04)
- Re: [OT] Re: Banned on NANOG Richard Irving (Dec 04)
- Re: [OT] Re: Banned on NANOG Dan Hollis (Dec 04)
- Re: [OT] Re: Banned on NANOG nanog gonan (Dec 06)
- RE: [OT] Re: Banned on NANOG Alex Rubenstein (Dec 02)
- Re: [OT] Re: Banned on NANOG Bill Nash (Dec 04)
- Re: [OT] Re: Banned on NANOG Stephen Sprunk (Dec 04)
- Re: [OT] Re: Banned on NANOG Bill Nash (Dec 04)
- Re: [OT] Re: Banned on NANOG Daniel Golding (Dec 04)
- Re: [OT] Re: Banned on NANOG Suresh Ramasubramanian (Dec 04)
- RE: [OT] Re: Banned on NANOG william(at)elan.net (Dec 02)