Re: [OT] Re: Banned on NANOG

[suresh () outblaze com (Suresh Ramasubramanian)]

Daniel Golding <dgolding () burtongroup com> wrote:

> The complaints concerning list moderation certainly have merit (no pun
> intended). There are wildly inconsistent moderation standards along with a
> growing fear of being banned from a wide variety of folks. The least

Well, for example, Randy seems to have been banned soon after he substituted
the more usual "North American Noise and Offtopic Gripes" with "ops sheep
willing to be censored by a non op" in a nanog post that was otherwise
operational in content (nanog thread "anycast stability experiment")

https://www.ripe.net/ripe/maillists/archives/routing-wg/2004/msg00183.html

> The "if you don't like it, start your own" suggestion is not a bad idea.
> However, many folks in the community have an investment in NANOG, and, as

cf Bugtraq readers forking to start full-disclosure () lists netsys com?

        srs