nanog mailing list archives
Re: rfc1918 ignorant
From: Dave Temkin <dave () ordinaryworld com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 13:50:05 -0400 (EDT)
Needs is a tough call. Plenty of networks block ICMP at the border and could very well be using 1918 addressing in between and you'd have no idea. -- David Temkin On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
On Wednesday, July 23, 2003, at 11:40 AM, Dave Temkin wrote:Except you're making assumptions as to how that router is used. If it's being used for purely transit then your third paragraph doesn't apply at all. The traffic is not originating or terminating there, it is merely passing through.When the router needs to send an ICMP packet back to the source it becomes an originator. --lyndon
Current thread:
- Re: rfc1918 ignorant, (continued)
- Re: rfc1918 ignorant Haesu (Jul 23)
- Re: rfc1918 ignorant Henk Uijterwaal (RIPE-NCC) (Jul 23)
- re: rfc1918 ignorant Dave Temkin (Jul 23)
- re: rfc1918 ignorant variable (Jul 23)
- source filtering (Re: rfc1918 ignorant) Jared Mauch (Jul 23)
- Re: source filtering (Re: rfc1918 ignorant) variable (Jul 24)
- Re: source filtering (Re: rfc1918 ignorant) Jared Mauch (Jul 24)
- re: rfc1918 ignorant variable (Jul 23)
- RE: rfc1918 ignorant David Schwartz (Jul 23)
- RE: rfc1918 ignorant Dave Temkin (Jul 23)
- Re: rfc1918 ignorant Lyndon Nerenberg (Jul 23)
- Re: rfc1918 ignorant Dave Temkin (Jul 23)
- Re: rfc1918 ignorant Lyndon Nerenberg (Jul 23)
- Re: rfc1918 ignorant Kevin Oberman (Jul 23)
- Re: rfc1918 ignorant Dave Temkin (Jul 23)
- Re: rfc1918 ignorant Petri Helenius (Jul 23)
- Re: rfc1918 ignorant John Palmer (Jul 23)
- Re: rfc1918 ignorant Petri Helenius (Jul 23)
- Re: rfc1918 ignorant Kevin Oberman (Jul 23)
- Re: rfc1918 ignorant bdragon (Jul 23)
- Re: rfc1918 ignorant Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 23)
- Re: rfc1918 ignorant Jared Mauch (Jul 23)