nanog mailing list archives
Re: rfc1918 ignorant
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 13:49:37 -0400
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 13:40:03 EDT, Dave Temkin said:
If it's being used for purely transit then your third paragraph doesn't apply at all. The traffic is not originating or terminating there, it is merely passing through.
If it shows up on a traceroute, it originated an ICMP packet. 10 * * * 11 * * * 12 * * * would be "proper" behavior if it was *purely* transit-only.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: rfc1918 ignorant, (continued)
- Re: rfc1918 ignorant Lyndon Nerenberg (Jul 23)
- Re: rfc1918 ignorant Dave Temkin (Jul 23)
- Re: rfc1918 ignorant Lyndon Nerenberg (Jul 23)
- Re: rfc1918 ignorant Kevin Oberman (Jul 23)
- Re: rfc1918 ignorant Dave Temkin (Jul 23)
- Re: rfc1918 ignorant Petri Helenius (Jul 23)
- Re: rfc1918 ignorant John Palmer (Jul 23)
- Re: rfc1918 ignorant Petri Helenius (Jul 23)
- Re: rfc1918 ignorant Kevin Oberman (Jul 23)
- Re: rfc1918 ignorant bdragon (Jul 23)
- Re: rfc1918 ignorant Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 23)
- Re: rfc1918 ignorant Jared Mauch (Jul 23)
- Re: rfc1918 ignorant Kevin Oberman (Jul 23)
- Re: rfc1918 ignorant Daniel Karrenberg (Jul 23)
- RE: rfc1918 ignorant Dave Temkin (Jul 23)