Re: rfc1918 ignorant

["Petri Helenius" <pete () he iki fi>]

> When the RFC's are broken, then what do you do?

If negotiations fail, you revolt and overthrow the corrupt governing body.
If applicable, add overseas occupation forces :)
> RFC's are to be followed if one can operate one's network
> under those constraints. Often times, RFC's don't take into
> account real world considerations.
Unfortunately putting the non-rfc-compliant out of business would
require distributing clue to the buyers, which has been tried and
usually fails.

> For instance: The "rule" that there should be only one root
> server network does not provide a solution to the problem of
> a corrupt monopoly gaining control over that one root server
> network (as is the case now).

You sure have filed drafts how this should be corrected, specially 
those which do not specify two roots, yours and theirs? 

Pete