nanog mailing list archives
Re: source filtering (Re: rfc1918 ignorant)
From: variable () ednet co uk
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 13:44:33 +0100 (BST)
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Jared Mauch wrote:
I think you'll see more and more networks slowly over time move closer to bcp38.
Is there anywhere that this is recorded? It would be interesting to see what the actual state of play on implementation of BCP38 was.
I believe that AT&T is the only "tier-1" provider that is in full compliance with this.
We've asked other tier-1's about BCP38 and were completely underwhelmed by the response. If you believe in the BCPs then I guess you just have to vote with your feet and try to use transit providers which comply with them. We've been trying to get transit from AT&T in London for a while now, but they're obviously spending all their efforts on blocking RFC1918 traffic rather than talking to prospective customers. :-S Rich
Current thread:
- rfc1918 ignorant Frank Louwers (Jul 23)
- Re: rfc1918 ignorant David Lesher (Jul 23)
- Re: rfc1918 ignorant Vinny Abello (Jul 23)
- Re: rfc1918 ignorant Haesu (Jul 23)
- Re: rfc1918 ignorant Henk Uijterwaal (RIPE-NCC) (Jul 23)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- re: rfc1918 ignorant Dave Temkin (Jul 23)
- re: rfc1918 ignorant variable (Jul 23)
- source filtering (Re: rfc1918 ignorant) Jared Mauch (Jul 23)
- Re: source filtering (Re: rfc1918 ignorant) variable (Jul 24)
- Re: source filtering (Re: rfc1918 ignorant) Jared Mauch (Jul 24)
- re: rfc1918 ignorant variable (Jul 23)
- RE: rfc1918 ignorant David Schwartz (Jul 23)
- RE: rfc1918 ignorant Dave Temkin (Jul 23)
- Re: rfc1918 ignorant Lyndon Nerenberg (Jul 23)
- Re: rfc1918 ignorant Dave Temkin (Jul 23)
- Re: rfc1918 ignorant Lyndon Nerenberg (Jul 23)
- Re: rfc1918 ignorant Kevin Oberman (Jul 23)
- Re: rfc1918 ignorant Dave Temkin (Jul 23)
- Re: rfc1918 ignorant Petri Helenius (Jul 23)
- Re: rfc1918 ignorant John Palmer (Jul 23)