nanog mailing list archives

RE: rfc1918 ignorant

From: "Daryl G. Jurbala" <daryl () introspect net>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 13:24:38 -0400


Ahhh...but this all comes down to how one defines "enterprise" and it's
network scope. IANALBPSB (I am not a lawyer but probably shoud be)

Daryl

PGP Key: http://www.introspect.net/pgp  

[...]

That's not what is in my copy of 1918.

"In order to use private address space, an enterprise needs 
to determine which hosts do not need to have network layer 
connectivity outside the enterprise in the foreseeable future 
and thus could be classified as private. Such hosts will use

[...]

Current thread:

Re: rfc1918 ignorant, (continued)
- - - Re: rfc1918 ignorant bdragon (Jul 23)
    - Re: rfc1918 ignorant Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 23)
    - Re: rfc1918 ignorant Jared Mauch (Jul 23)
    - Re: rfc1918 ignorant Kevin Oberman (Jul 23)
  - Re: rfc1918 ignorant Kevin Oberman (Jul 23)
    - Re: rfc1918 ignorant Daniel Karrenberg (Jul 23)
  - Re: rfc1918 ignorant bdragon (Jul 23)
- RE: rfc1918 ignorant Ben Buxton (Jul 23)
  - RE: rfc1918 ignorant Dave Temkin (Jul 23)
- re: rfc1918 ignorant Vinny Abello (Jul 23)
- RE: rfc1918 ignorant Daryl G. Jurbala (Jul 23)
- rfc1918 ignorant Muir, Ronald (Jul 23)
- Re: rfc1918 ignorant Stewart, William C (Bill), RTSLS (Jul 23)
- RE: rfc1918 ignorant McBurnett, Jim (Jul 24)
  - RE: rfc1918 ignorant up (Jul 24)
    - Re: rfc1918 ignorant Petri Helenius (Jul 24)
  - Re: rfc1918 ignorant Haesu (Jul 24)
- RE: rfc1918 ignorant McBurnett, Jim (Jul 24)