nanog mailing list archives
Re: Abuse.cc ???
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2003 10:44:22 -0500
On Thu, 03 Apr 2003 10:31:39 EST, "Steven M. Bellovin" said:
Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't this against RFC current practice?Yes -- see RFC 2142. But the IETF has no enforcement arm...
That would be NANOG's job (as much as it's anybody's). Soooo... http://www.rfc-ignorant.org
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Abuse.cc ??? McBurnett, Jim (Apr 03)
- Re: Abuse.cc ??? Johannes Ullrich (Apr 03)
- Re: Abuse.cc ??? Steven M. Bellovin (Apr 03)
- Re: Abuse.cc ??? Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 03)
- Re: Abuse.cc ??? Frank Louwers (Apr 03)
- Re: Abuse.cc ??? Gerald (Apr 03)
- Re: Abuse.cc ??? Simon Lyall (Apr 04)
- Re: Abuse.cc ??? Dan Hollis (Apr 03)
- Re: Abuse.cc ??? Owen DeLong (Apr 03)
- Re: Abuse.cc ??? Dan Hollis (Apr 03)
- Re: Abuse.cc ??? Owen DeLong (Apr 04)
- Re: Abuse.cc ??? Gerald (Apr 03)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Abuse.cc ??? Dan Hollis (Apr 03)
- RE: Abuse.cc ??? McBurnett, Jim (Apr 04)
- RE: Abuse.cc ??? Dan Hollis (Apr 04)