nanog mailing list archives

Re: Abuse.cc ???


From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb () research att com>
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2003 10:31:39 -0500


In message <390E55B947E7C848898AEBB9E507706041E630 () msmdcfs01 msmgmt com>, "McBu
rnett, Jim" writes:


I just made a number of abuse complaints to a provider and then after =
contacting the abuse #.=20
I got told that they don't use abuse@ anymore. that abuse.cc is the new =
email address.

Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't this against RFC current practice?


Yes -- see RFC 2142.  But the IETF has no enforcement arm...


                --Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb (me)
                http://www.wilyhacker.com (2nd edition of "Firewalls" book)



Current thread: