nanog mailing list archives
Re: Abuse.cc ???
From: "Johannes Ullrich" <jullrich () euclidian com>
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 10:17:06 -0500
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003 10:05:55 -0500 "McBurnett, Jim" <jmcburnett () msmgmt com> wrote:
I just made a number of abuse complaints to a provider and then after contacting the abuse #. I got told that they don't use abuse@ anymore. that abuse.cc is the new email address. Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't this against RFC current practice?
hm. send the RFC police after them :-/... fact is that there are plenty of domains that do not even have an abuse@ e-mail address. Never mind the once that don't accept any abuse/security related e-mail and instead direct you to a web form. (personal favorite: mail bouncing from abuse@ due to mailbox full) -- -------------------------------------------------------------------- jullrich () euclidian com Collaborative Intrusion Detection join http://www.dshield.org
Current thread:
- Abuse.cc ??? McBurnett, Jim (Apr 03)
- Re: Abuse.cc ??? Johannes Ullrich (Apr 03)
- Re: Abuse.cc ??? Steven M. Bellovin (Apr 03)
- Re: Abuse.cc ??? Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 03)
- Re: Abuse.cc ??? Frank Louwers (Apr 03)
- Re: Abuse.cc ??? Gerald (Apr 03)
- Re: Abuse.cc ??? Simon Lyall (Apr 04)
- Re: Abuse.cc ??? Dan Hollis (Apr 03)
- Re: Abuse.cc ??? Owen DeLong (Apr 03)
- Re: Abuse.cc ??? Dan Hollis (Apr 03)
- Re: Abuse.cc ??? Owen DeLong (Apr 04)
- Re: Abuse.cc ??? Gerald (Apr 03)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Abuse.cc ??? Dan Hollis (Apr 03)