nanog mailing list archives
RE: Abuse.cc ???
From: Dan Hollis <goemon () anime net>
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 20:35:59 -0800 (PST)
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, McBurnett, Jim wrote:
Yesterday, I got word from a network operator that 50 entries was not sufficient. So I parsed 4 days's worth and sent them over 1200 messages from their block.. have not heard back yet..
I love the operators who deny the ip block belongs to them, so you send them back a whois with the appropriate bits underlined. This happens a *lot* with tier1's, who really should know better.
Some ISP's either /dev/null all of it, or they can't stop their users or politics stop 'em..
With a lot of providers the official policy is to let the user do whatever they want as long as the check doesnt bounce and as long as a police officer doesnt arrive on the doorstep with a subpoena. But boy do they make a stink when people blackhole them! -Dan -- [-] Omae no subete no kichi wa ore no mono da. [-]
Current thread:
- Re: Abuse.cc ???, (continued)
- Re: Abuse.cc ??? Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 03)
- Re: Abuse.cc ??? Frank Louwers (Apr 03)
- Re: Abuse.cc ??? Gerald (Apr 03)
- Re: Abuse.cc ??? Simon Lyall (Apr 04)
- Re: Abuse.cc ??? Dan Hollis (Apr 03)
- Re: Abuse.cc ??? Owen DeLong (Apr 03)
- Re: Abuse.cc ??? Dan Hollis (Apr 03)
- Re: Abuse.cc ??? Owen DeLong (Apr 04)
- Re: Abuse.cc ??? Gerald (Apr 03)
- RE: Abuse.cc ??? Dan Hollis (Apr 04)
- Re: Abuse.cc ??? Jeff Kell (Apr 04)
- Re: Abuse.cc ??? Matthew S. Hallacy (Apr 05)
- Re: Abuse.cc ??? Jack Bates (Apr 05)