nanog mailing list archives
Re: Open relays and open proxies
From: John Payne <john () sackheads org>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 18:07:45 -0400
--On Thursday, April 24, 2003 9:50 PM +0000 Paul Vixie <vixie () vix com> wrote:
On the other hand, NJABL.ORG lists 255K open relays, 170K open proxies, and a spattering of dialups and other listings. This is way beyond ACLs that I could even imagine thinking about :-)anyone who was facile with perl could transform a full list of open relays or proxies into something that avibgpd could use, so that you could have your access controls implemented as routes rather than acl's. if you
Which is exactly what opm.blitzed.org's BGP feed does ;)(I was taking avibgpd -> zebra for explosion, but when the BGP box comes back from the dead, will be native avibgpd)
Current thread:
- Re: Open relays and open proxies, (continued)
- Re: Open relays and open proxies Daniel Concepcion (Apr 25)
- Re: Open relays and open proxies Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 25)
- Re: Open relays and open proxies John Payne (Apr 25)
- Re: Open relays and open proxies Daniel Concepcion (Apr 25)
- Re: Open relays and open proxies John Payne (Apr 25)
- Re: Open relays and open proxies Jack Bates (Apr 25)
- Re: Open relays and open proxies Adi Linden (Apr 25)
- Re: Open relays and open proxies jlewis (Apr 24)
- Re: Open relays and open proxies Paul Vixie (Apr 24)
- Re: Open relays and open proxies Jack Bates (Apr 24)
- Re: Open relays and open proxies John Payne (Apr 24)
- Re[2]: Open relays and open proxies Richard Cox (Apr 25)
- RE: Open relays and open proxies Joseph Barnhart (Apr 30)