nanog mailing list archives
Re: Interconnects
From: Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 17:02:53 -0400 (EDT)
On Fri, 17 May 2002 bmanning () karoshi com wrote:
perhaps better late than never... PAIX & LINX both
have IPv6 capabilities at/on the exchange fabric(s).
I am not aware that Equinix has taken that step.
Uhm, another dumb question. Why does the operator of a layer 2 exchange care (or know) what protocols your are using? IPv4, IPv6, heck I remember seeing Appletalk, OSI and DECNET on MAE-EAST. What consenting network operators do.... What step does Equinix (or any other layer 2 exchange) need to do? The ATM NAPs might have an issue due to ATM/ARP, but even then I suspect two consenting network operators could use static IPv6 ARP tables without the NAP operator doing anything.
Current thread:
- RE: PAIX (was Re: Interconnects), (continued)
- RE: PAIX (was Re: Interconnects) Daniel Golding (May 22)
- RE: PAIX (was Re: Interconnects) Patrick W. Gilmore (May 23)
- Re: Interconnects Mitch Halmu (May 17)
- RE: Interconnects Daniel Golding (May 20)
- Re: Interconnects Paul Vixie (May 20)
- Re: Interconnects Alex Rubenstein (May 17)
- Re: Interconnects Alex Rubenstein (May 17)
- Re: Interconnects Anthony D Cennami (May 17)
- Re: Interconnects E.B. Dreger (May 17)
- Re: Interconnects Sean Donelan (May 17)
- Re: Interconnects Stephen Stuart (May 17)
- Re: Interconnects Stephen Griffin (May 17)
- Re: Interconnects bmanning (May 17)
- Re: Interconnects Mark Kent (May 17)
- Re: Interconnects bmanning (May 17)