nanog mailing list archives
RE: Interconnects
From: "Daniel Golding" <dgolding () sockeye com>
Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 18:54:04 -0400
PAIX shares MFN/Abovenet's peering agreements? That's quite a trick. While Above does peer at PAIX, as do many other folks, the amount of peering that Above has there does not speak to the quality of the exchange point, nor does it add value in any real way. There is MFN fiber in there, but that goes without saying. This is not to slam PAIX or Paul Vixie - I'm a big PAIX fan, and Paul has done a superb job. However, MFN adds no value, and only hurts PAIX's credibility with it's massive financial problem. PAIX without MFN will, once again, be a great thing. Hopefully this will be soon. - Daniel Golding
todd glassey Says... PAIX is a division of MFN (Metropolitan Fiber Networks) as Above.NET is as well. That means they share MFN's connectivity and peering agreements and as such are incredibly rich environments. Especially with someone like Paul Vixie running it, (PAIX that is) my take is that these are number one providers. I must admit though that I am a staunch Above.NET supporter and have been for ages having a single digit customer ID. Todd ----- Original Message ----- From: "ren" <ren () internet rockstar org> To: "Ralph Doncaster" <ralph () istop com> Cc: "Iljitsch van Beijnum" <iljitsch () muada com>; <nanog () nanog org> Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 5:01 AM Subject: Re: InterconnectsThat depends on your corporate needs for power, security, remote hands, etc. The extended services found at Equinix & PAIX are veryimportant formany networks. -ren At 08:00 AM 5/17/2002 -0400, Ralph Doncaster wrote:What about NYIIX/6IIX? Being in Telehouse where there are no monthly fees for forcross-connectsgives it a financial advantage over Equinix. Ralph Doncaster principal, IStop.com div. of Doncaster Consulting Inc. On Fri, 17 May 2002, ren wrote:Hi Iljitsch, I would not consider Sprint NAP, a place closed to new customers for several years, an important interconnect location in the US. ATMbasedIXsare not as participant rich as they were 2-3 years ago. The fastest growing US interconnect locations are cross-connect enabled. PAIX & Equinix. Equinix-Ashburn, PAIX-Seattle,Equinix-Newarkand Equinix-Dallas and others have seen participation grow with adiverseblend of traffic from cable operators, telcos and content providers. Tier-1 means what? Look for growing sources of traffic. Your mileage may vary, -ren At 11:48 AM 5/17/2002 +0200, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:A bunch of us are thinking about multihoming solutions forIPv6. For thispurpose, it is useful to know a bit more about how actual networks(ratherthan the ones existing only as ASCII drawings) interconnect. So: - What are the 12 - 18 most important interconnect locations in theworld?MAE East, the Ameritech, Sprint and PacBell NAPs, PAIX, LINX andAMS-IXcome to mind, but from where I'm sitting it's hard to judgewhetherothers are important or marginal. - To how many of them do typical tier-1 and tier-2networks connect?- Using private or public interconnects?
Current thread:
- PAIX (was Re: Interconnects), (continued)
- PAIX (was Re: Interconnects) Paul Vixie (May 17)
- Re: PAIX (was Re: Interconnects) Ralph Doncaster (May 18)
- Re: PAIX (was Re: Interconnects) Paul Vixie (May 18)
- Re: PAIX (was Re: Interconnects) Ralph Doncaster (May 18)
- Re: PAIX (was Re: Interconnects) Simon Lockhart (May 18)
- Re: PAIX (was Re: Interconnects) Majdi S. Abbas (May 18)
- Re: PAIX (was Re: Interconnects) Ralph Doncaster (May 19)
- RE: PAIX (was Re: Interconnects) Daniel Golding (May 22)
- RE: PAIX (was Re: Interconnects) Patrick W. Gilmore (May 23)
- Re: Interconnects Mitch Halmu (May 17)
- RE: Interconnects Daniel Golding (May 20)
- Re: Interconnects Paul Vixie (May 20)
- Re: Interconnects Alex Rubenstein (May 17)
- Re: Interconnects Anthony D Cennami (May 17)
- Re: Interconnects E.B. Dreger (May 17)
- Re: Interconnects Sean Donelan (May 17)
- Re: Interconnects Stephen Stuart (May 17)
- Re: Interconnects Stephen Griffin (May 17)
- Re: Interconnects bmanning (May 17)