nanog mailing list archives
Re: Interconnects
From: Mark Kent <mark () noc mainstreet net>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 16:01:52 -0700 (PDT)
bmanning () karoshi com wrote:
I would expect that if the Equinix exchange participants were IPv6 hungry ...
Let me toss in a question that may really be dumb... what are those that are hungry for IPV6 doing with it? I figure that organizations that run IPV6 now think they are ahead of the game. Are they? Is this something that responsible ISPs should be doing? Would this turn our network into one big NAT area when we have to translate into IPV4 addresses at the edge to get to the real Internet? -mark !bankrupt, hence !Tier1
Current thread:
- Re: Interconnects, (continued)
- Re: Interconnects Paul Vixie (May 20)
- Re: Interconnects Alex Rubenstein (May 17)
- Re: Interconnects Alex Rubenstein (May 17)
- Re: Interconnects Anthony D Cennami (May 17)
- Re: Interconnects E.B. Dreger (May 17)
- Re: Interconnects bmanning (May 17)
- Re: Interconnects Sean Donelan (May 17)
- Re: Interconnects Stephen Stuart (May 17)
- Re: Interconnects Stephen Griffin (May 17)
- Re: Interconnects bmanning (May 17)
- Re: Interconnects Mark Kent (May 17)
- Re: Interconnects bmanning (May 17)
- Re: Interconnects Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino (May 17)
- Re: Interconnects bmanning (May 17)
- Re: Interconnects Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino (May 17)
- Re: Interconnects Stephen J. Wilcox (May 18)
- Re: Interconnects Marshall Eubanks (May 18)
- Re: Interconnects Stephen J. Wilcox (May 18)
- Re: Interconnects Ralph Doncaster (May 17)
- Re: Interconnects Alex Rubenstein (May 17)