nanog mailing list archives
Re: SPEWS?
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 15:58:35 -0400
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002 14:33:18 EDT, Sandy Harris <pashley () storm ca> said:
If the offending ISP does not respond, and you have exhausted all avenues available to you to get the ISP to get its customer to stop spamming - whether by TOS'ing the customer, education or whatever -... and you've waited a reasonable time ... Then the ISP is obviously either incompetent or deliberately aiding the spammers. Why should you even consider anything less than blacklisting every netblock the ISP has?
What do you do if the ISP says "We want to turn them off, but they've managed to get a restraining order preventing us"? We've seen THAT before.... -- Valdis Kletnieks Computer Systems Senior Engineer Virginia Tech
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: SPEWS?, (continued)
- Re: SPEWS? Greg A. Woods (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? Regis M. Donovan (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? Dan Hollis (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? Steven J. Sobol (Jun 20)
- RE: SPEWS? Benjamin P. Grubin (Jun 20)
- RE: SPEWS? Steven J. Sobol (Jun 20)
- RE: SPEWS? Benjamin P. Grubin (Jun 20)
- RE: SPEWS? Steven J. Sobol (Jun 20)
- RE: SPEWS? Benjamin P. Grubin (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? Sandy Harris (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? Steven J. Sobol (Jun 20)
- Re[2]: SPEWS? Richard Welty (Jun 20)
- Re: Re[2]: SPEWS? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 20)
- Re[2]: SPEWS? Steven J. Sobol (Jun 20)
- Re[3]: SPEWS? Richard Welty (Jun 20)
- Re[3]: SPEWS? Steven J. Sobol (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? Sandy Harris (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? Jim Segrave (Jun 21)
- Re: SPEWS? Richard A Steenbergen (Jun 21)
- Re: SPEWS? Peter Galbavy (Jun 21)