nanog mailing list archives

Re: SPEWS?

From: "Peter Galbavy" <peter.galbavy () knowtion net>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 17:13:32 +0100

I fail to see how blacklisting neighboring subnets (not associated with
the organization in question) instead of just the offending one is "in
order".


It depends on your maturity and 'professionalism' I guess. Some of us see
the problem, some see it as a 'cool way of getting attention'.

Peter

Current thread:

Re: SPEWS?, (continued)
- Re: SPEWS? william (Jun 19)
  - Re[2]: SPEWS? Richard Welty (Jun 19)
  - Re: SPEWS? Steven J. Sobol (Jun 20)
    - Re: SPEWS? william (Jun 20)
  - Re: SPEWS? up (Jun 20)
  - Re: SPEWS? Nathan J. Mehl (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? Richard A Steenbergen (Jun 19)
  - Re: SPEWS? jlewis (Jun 19)
- Re: SPEWS? Steven J. Sobol (Jun 20)
  - Re: SPEWS? Clayton Fiske (Jun 20)
    - Re: SPEWS? Peter Galbavy (Jun 20)
    - Re: SPEWS? Steven J. Sobol (Jun 20)
    - Re: SPEWS? Steven J. Sobol (Jun 20)
    - Re: SPEWS? Andy Johnson (Jun 20)
    - Re: SPEWS? Steven J. Sobol (Jun 20)
    - Re: SPEWS? Regis M. Donovan (Jun 20)
    - Re: SPEWS? Dan Hollis (Jun 20)
    - Re: SPEWS? David Charlap (Jun 20)
    - Re: SPEWS? Dan Hollis (Jun 20)
    - Re: SPEWS? Randy Bush (Jun 20)
    - Re: SPEWS? David Charlap (Jun 20)

(Thread continues...)