nanog mailing list archives

Re: SPEWS?

From: "Regis M. Donovan" <regis () offhand org>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 16:32:25 -0400


On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 02:35:16PM -0400, Steven J. Sobol wrote:

*Spamming* or launching a DoS attack in response to spam is definitely
abusive.


and black-holing "innocent bystander" networks not a denial of service?

--regis

Current thread:

Re: SPEWS?, (continued)
- - Re: SPEWS? Nathan J. Mehl (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? Richard A Steenbergen (Jun 19)
  - Re: SPEWS? jlewis (Jun 19)
- Re: SPEWS? Steven J. Sobol (Jun 20)
  - Re: SPEWS? Clayton Fiske (Jun 20)
    - Re: SPEWS? Peter Galbavy (Jun 20)
    - Re: SPEWS? Steven J. Sobol (Jun 20)
    - Re: SPEWS? Steven J. Sobol (Jun 20)
    - Re: SPEWS? Andy Johnson (Jun 20)
    - Re: SPEWS? Steven J. Sobol (Jun 20)
    - Re: SPEWS? Regis M. Donovan (Jun 20)
    - Re: SPEWS? Dan Hollis (Jun 20)
    - Re: SPEWS? David Charlap (Jun 20)
    - Re: SPEWS? Dan Hollis (Jun 20)
    - Re: SPEWS? Randy Bush (Jun 20)
    - Re: SPEWS? David Charlap (Jun 20)
    - Re: SPEWS? Dan Hollis (Jun 20)
    - Re: SPEWS? measl (Jun 20)
    - Re: SPEWS? Steven J. Sobol (Jun 20)
    - Re: SPEWS? Greg A. Woods (Jun 20)
    - Re: SPEWS? Regis M. Donovan (Jun 20)

(Thread continues...)