nanog mailing list archives
Re: SPEWS?
From: <william () elan net>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 13:02:08 -0700 (PDT)
I'v had similar problems as Alex with SPEW and also got the same reaction. They have serious attitude problem. And no, SBC is not using SPEW, I think they have their own blacklist based on actual incidents and I think they are smart enough not to put themselve under legal risks for using SPEW.
Overzealous to say the least (i.e. without using language used by people at spewsUh... Most of the people that were yelling at Alex probably had absolutely nothing to do with SPEWS. NANAE != SPEWS.which by itself should already say something about how professional they are). Its used primarily by very small sstem operators and I don't know any isp of any serious size (i.e. over 1000 users or domains) that is using them,I believe SBC's ISPs are. -- Steve Sobol, CTO JustThe.net LLC, Mentor On The Lake, OH 888.480.4NET - I do my best work with one of my cockatiels sitting on each shoulder - 6/4/02:A USA TODAY poll found that 80% of Catholics advocated a
Current thread:
- SPEWS? Alex Rubenstein (Jun 19)
- RE: SPEWS? Mark Radabaugh (Jun 19)
- RE: SPEWS? Alex Rubenstein (Jun 19)
- Re: SPEWS? Lionel (Jun 19)
- Re: SPEWS? Marc MERLIN (Jun 19)
- Re: SPEWS? Jason Slagle (Jun 19)
- RE: SPEWS? Alex Rubenstein (Jun 19)
- RE: SPEWS? Mark Radabaugh (Jun 19)
- Re: SPEWS? jlewis (Jun 19)
- Re: SPEWS? william (Jun 19)
- Re[2]: SPEWS? Richard Welty (Jun 19)
- Re: SPEWS? Steven J. Sobol (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? william (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? up (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? Nathan J. Mehl (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? Richard A Steenbergen (Jun 19)
- Re: SPEWS? jlewis (Jun 19)
- Re: SPEWS? Steven J. Sobol (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? Clayton Fiske (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? Peter Galbavy (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? Steven J. Sobol (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? Steven J. Sobol (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? Andy Johnson (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? Clayton Fiske (Jun 20)