nanog mailing list archives

Re: SPEWS?


From: Clayton Fiske <clay () bloomcounty org>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 09:05:31 -0700


On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 08:40:11AM -0400, Steven J. Sobol wrote:

On Wed, 19 Jun 2002, Alex Rubenstein wrote:

Nevertheless, he was zapped. He had a /27, and
SPEWs listed the entire /24 surrounding it. When I asked about this, they
said, in not-so-many-words, that by doing this, punishing innocent
bystanders, that as long as the ISP noticed and fixed the issue, this was
essentially OK to do.

I agree with that, *if* initial notifications to the ISP are ignored. 
Escalations are then in order, definitely.

I fail to see how blacklisting neighboring subnets (not associated with
the organization in question) instead of just the offending one is "in
order".

-c


Current thread: