nanog mailing list archives

Re: ATTBI refuses to do reverse DNS?


From: "Frank P. Tower" <frankt () northnet net>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 16:19:27 -0500



At 04:32 PM 6/19/02, Chris Woodfield wrote:

Time Warner agreed to do so as a condition of the AOL merger. Most other 
cable
companies are fighting this tooth and nail, and winning (see AT&T in 
Portland,
Oregon).

And in doing it, so far they seem to only be allowing the likes of 
Earthlink, not smaller providers. If anyone's got news to the contrary, I'd 
sure like to hear it.

AOL/TW has authorized a smaller ISP (around 20,000 subscribers) in our
area (central Wisconsin) to offer service over their cable network.
Last I heard they were planning on a September start date.


-C

Was there not once upon a time there was a proposal to require cable-cos
to provide what would effectively be layer-2 service to any IP provider?

I think that requirement still stands in Canada, but until newer
standards-compliant cable modems become more common it's "hard" to do
and so nobody's doing it yet (and there is some whining on both sides).

--
                                                              Greg A. Woods

+1 416 
218-0098;  <gwoods () acm org>;  <g.a.woods () ieee org>;  <woods () robohack ca>
Planix, Inc. <woods () planix com>; VE3TCP; Secrets of the Weird 
<woods () weird com>

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Daniel Senie                                        dts () senie com
Amaranth Networks Inc.                    http://www.amaranth.com


--
Frank P. Tower                        NorthNet, LLC.
Managing Director                     phone:  920.233.5641
email:  frankt () northnet net           web:  www.northnet.net




Current thread: