nanog mailing list archives
Re: verio arrogance
From: Brian Wallingford <brian () meganet net>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 14:14:51 -0400 (EDT)
: : They tend to match the size of the smallest block assigned by the :registries. : Calling it a tendency is probably a stretch. They only bowed to RIR policy once in recent memory, when ARIN began allocating /20 PI blocks. Prior to that, they nearly got their logo placed in Webster's dictionaries under "anal". That said, their current policy of refusing to accept de-aggregated prefixes from peers (while accepting such from paying customers) makes perfect sense, IMHO. Not arrogant, just a smart & reasonable business decision. cheers, brian
Current thread:
- verio arrogance Ralph Doncaster (Jul 15)
- Re: verio arrogance Richard A Steenbergen (Jul 15)
- Re: verio arrogance Marshall Eubanks (Jul 15)
- Re: verio arrogance Ralph Doncaster (Jul 15)
- RE: verio arrogance Daniel Golding (Jul 18)
- Re: verio arrogance up (Jul 15)
- Re: verio arrogance Austin Schutz (Jul 17)
- Re: verio arrogance Brian Wallingford (Jul 17)
- china telecom noc contact ? Anthony Pardini (Jul 17)
- Re: china telecom noc contact ? German Martinez (Jul 17)
- Re: verio arrogance Kurt Erik Lindqvist (Jul 18)
- Re: verio arrogance Peter E. Fry (Jul 18)
- Re: verio arrogance Ralph Doncaster (Jul 18)
- Re: verio arrogance Mark Kent (Jul 18)
- Re: verio arrogance Stephen Griffin (Jul 26)
- Re: verio arrogance Ralph Doncaster (Jul 26)
- Re: verio arrogance Stephen Griffin (Jul 26)
- Re: verio arrogance Ralph Doncaster (Jul 26)
- Re: verio arrogance Austin Schutz (Jul 17)
- Re: verio arrogance Richard A Steenbergen (Jul 15)