nanog mailing list archives
Re: Sprint peering policy
From: Richard A Steenbergen <ras () e-gerbil net>
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2002 15:41:43 -0400
On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 01:38:57PM -0400, Phil Rosenthal wrote:
I would venture to say that to WorldCom, all traffic is destined to a peer, or a customer, and they NEVER pay for traffic. Peering with them is entirely a courtesy from them to you, as they can always see you through their current peers.
I think you missed the definition of "tier 1"... Oh wait, we're all using made-up definitions anyways. Nevermind.
The fact that they failed, having had such extensive peering, proves that peering has no relation to financial difficulties (in my mind, at least)
You are one very confused individual. -- Richard A Steenbergen <ras () e-gerbil net> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras PGP Key ID: 0x138EA177 (67 29 D7 BC E8 18 3E DA B2 46 B3 D8 14 36 FE B6)
Current thread:
- RE: Sprint peering policy, (continued)
- RE: Sprint peering policy Phil Rosenthal (Jul 01)
- Re: Sprint peering policy Clayton Fiske (Jul 01)
- Re: Sprint peering policy alex (Jul 01)
- Re: Sprint peering policy Clayton Fiske (Jul 01)
- Re: Sprint peering policy Richard A Steenbergen (Jul 01)
- Re: Sprint peering policy alex (Jul 02)
- Re: Sprint peering policy Richard Irving (Jul 02)
- Re: Sprint peering policy Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 02)
- RE: Sprint peering policy Phil Rosenthal (Jul 01)
- Re: Sprint peering policy Clayton Fiske (Jul 01)
- Re: Sprint peering policy Richard A Steenbergen (Jul 01)
- RE: Sprint peering policy Phil Rosenthal (Jul 01)
- Re: Sprint peering policy Richard A Steenbergen (Jul 01)
- Re: Sprint peering policy Paul Vixie (Jul 01)
- Re: Sprint peering policy alex (Jul 01)
- RE: Sprint peering policy Deepak Jain (Jul 01)
- RE: Sprint peering policy Phil Rosenthal (Jul 01)
- Re: Sprint peering policy Richard A Steenbergen (Jul 01)
- Re: Sprint peering policy Paul Vixie (Jul 01)
- Re: Sprint peering policy Nigel Titley (Jul 02)
- RE: Sprint peering policy Deepak Jain (Jul 01)