nanog mailing list archives
Re: Sprint peering policy
From: alex () yuriev com
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2002 13:36:00 -0400 (EDT)
Here's a fun exercise: Drop your 5 busiest peers, and see if your operating costs a) increase, b) decrease, or c) remain the same.
If your full cost of peering with UUNET (including things such as depreciation) comes to $400 per mbit/sec and via a promisig local ISP you can get transit to UUNET at $200 per mbit/sec, your costs will decrease. Just because the IP is free with peering does not mean that it costs $0 to peer. Alex
Current thread:
- RE: Sprint peering policy, (continued)
- RE: Sprint peering policy David Schwartz (Jul 01)
- Game Theory (was: RE: Sprint peering policy) Scott A Crosby (Jul 01)
- Re: Sprint peering policy Richard Irving (Jul 01)
- RE: Sprint peering policy Phil Rosenthal (Jul 01)
- RE: Sprint peering policy David Schwartz (Jul 01)
- RE: Sprint peering policy Daniel Golding (Jul 01)
- Re: Sprint peering policy Richard Irving (Jul 01)
- RE: Sprint peering policy Daniel Golding (Jul 01)
- RE: Sprint peering policy Phil Rosenthal (Jul 01)
- Re: Sprint peering policy Clayton Fiske (Jul 01)
- Re: Sprint peering policy alex (Jul 01)
- Re: Sprint peering policy Clayton Fiske (Jul 01)
- Re: Sprint peering policy Richard A Steenbergen (Jul 01)
- Re: Sprint peering policy alex (Jul 02)
- Re: Sprint peering policy Richard Irving (Jul 02)
- Re: Sprint peering policy Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 02)
- Re: Sprint peering policy Richard Irving (Jul 01)
- RE: Sprint peering policy Phil Rosenthal (Jul 01)
- Re: Sprint peering policy Clayton Fiske (Jul 01)
- Re: Sprint peering policy Richard A Steenbergen (Jul 01)
- RE: Sprint peering policy Phil Rosenthal (Jul 01)
- Re: Sprint peering policy Richard A Steenbergen (Jul 01)