nanog mailing list archives
Re: routing table size
From: "gg" <ggregory () affinitas net>
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2002 13:22:54 -0500
Bradley wrote..... "If you're not their customer they don't owe you anything. Period. No matter how many times you post to NANOG." Hey...that reminds me of that old saying "Money talks, <insert> walks>" LOL Gerardo ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bradley Dunn" <bradley () dunn org> To: "Ralph Doncaster" <ralph () istop com> Cc: <nanog () merit edu> Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2002 11:15 AM Subject: Re: routing table size
On Sat, 27 Jul 2002, Ralph Doncaster wrote:If the size of the global routing table is really an important issue,
why
not start filtering /24 announcements?By all means, go ahead. You don't need anyone's permission. Report back
with
your results.I have more of a legal right to use my /20 since I pay ARIN >$2K/yr for it, vs most /24 owners.Setting aside the fallacy that people have different rights based on how
much
they paid for their allocation, you are of course free to announce
whatever
slices of your /20 you want. What you seem to have trouble grasping, and this is the key point, is that
the
rest of the world is free to ignore said announcements. If you're not
their
customer they don't owe you anything. Period. No matter how many times you
post
to NANOG. Bradley
Current thread:
- routing table size Ralph Doncaster (Jul 27)
- Re: routing table size Bradley Dunn (Jul 27)
- Re: routing table size gg (Jul 27)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: routing table size Ralph Doncaster (Jul 27)
- Re: routing table size David Schwartz (Jul 27)
- Re: routing table size Stephen J. Wilcox (Jul 27)
- Re: routing table size David Schwartz (Jul 27)
- Re: routing table size Stephen J. Wilcox (Jul 27)
- Re: routing table size Brian (Jul 29)
- Re: routing table size Richard A Steenbergen (Jul 29)
- Re: routing table size Paul Schultz (Jul 29)
- RE: routing table size Phil Rosenthal (Jul 29)
- Re: routing table size David Schwartz (Jul 27)
- Re: routing table size Bradley Dunn (Jul 27)