nanog mailing list archives
RE: AT&T NYC
From: alex () yuriev com
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 12:33:29 -0400 (EDT)
On Fri, 30 Aug 2002 alex () yuriev com wrote:I would definately not recommend route reflection or a confederation in a network with such a small number of BGP routers:In spirit of the above, I suggest you also do not have maintenance window, forget about re-checking configs, enable to do the simpliest commands, and of course let everyone try debugging any problems by typing random commands into your routers. After all, your network consists of only 4 routers.Ok, but how is _not_ using route reflection or a confederation similar to the above???
I fail to see how using confederations makes it complicated. In fact, should a network consist of two or above pops, and has more than one exit point, confederations are an excellent way to give one ability to fine tune traffic distribution. Alex
Current thread:
- RE: AT&T NYC, (continued)
- RE: AT&T NYC Derek Samford (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC Ralph Doncaster (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC Derek Samford (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC Ralph Doncaster (Aug 29)
- Re: AT&T NYC William Waites (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC Derek Samford (Aug 29)
- Re: AT&T NYC Mark Kent (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC Iljitsch van Beijnum (Aug 30)
- RE: AT&T NYC alex (Aug 30)
- RE: AT&T NYC Iljitsch van Beijnum (Aug 30)
- RE: AT&T NYC alex (Aug 30)
- RE: AT&T NYC Daniel Golding (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC Ralph Doncaster (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC alex (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC Dmitri Krioukov (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC Derek Samford (Aug 29)
- Re: AT&T NYC alex (Aug 29)
- Re: AT&T NYC alex (Aug 29)