nanog mailing list archives

RE: HR 1542

From: Roeland Meyer <rmeyer () mhsc com>
Date: Sun, 6 May 2001 23:41:33 -0700

From: Charles Sprickman [mailto:spork () inch com]
Sent: Saturday, May 05, 2001 2:42 PM

Adelphia is not a regulated public utility, that's the difference.


Yes, and a number of us look at their "exclusive" agreements, with many
municiplaities, and have been asking why they are not a regulated monopoly.
Those contracts are as anti-competitive as it gets.

Current thread:

Re: HR 1542, (continued)
- Re: HR 1542 Steve Sobol (May 05)
  - Re: HR 1542 Charles Sprickman (May 05)
    - Re: HR 1542 Steve Sobol (May 05)
    - Re[2]: HR 1542 Joe McGuckin (May 05)
    - Re: HR 1542 Daniel Senie (May 05)
  - Re: HR 1542 Joseph T. Klein (May 05)
  - Re: HR 1542 David Lesher (May 05)
  - Re: HR 1542 Jeff Mcadams (May 05)
    - Re: HR 1542 Steve Sobol (May 06)
    - Re: HR 1542 Jeff Mcadams (May 06)
- RE: HR 1542 Roeland Meyer (May 06)
  - Re: HR 1542 [OT, anti-BS attempt, US] Fletcher E Kittredge (May 07)
    - Re: HR 1542 [OT, anti-BS attempt, US] Miles Fidelman (May 07)
    - Re: HR 1542 [OT, anti-BS attempt, US] Fletcher E Kittredge (May 07)
    - Re: HR 1542 [OT, anti-BS attempt, US] Miles Fidelman (May 07)
    - Re: HR 1542 [OT, anti-BS attempt, US] Fletcher E Kittredge (May 08)
    - Re: HR 1542 [OT, anti-BS attempt, US] Jeff Mcadams (May 07)
    - more on cable companies RJ Atkinson (May 07)
    - Re: more on cable companies Miles Fidelman (May 07)
    - Re: more on cable companies Jeff Mcadams (May 07)
    - Re: HR 1542 [OT, anti-BS attempt, US] Joe Rhett (May 07)

(Thread continues...)