nanog mailing list archives
RE: QOS or more bandwidth
From: Greg Maxwell <gmaxwell () martin fl us>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 14:03:24 -0400 (EDT)
On Tue, 29 May 2001, Eric Whitehill wrote:
I know of someone who is trying to do a VOIP system over a wireless network - they are having limited success, but when they did some packet switching magic, it seemed to help some, but last I checked they are still having issues with it dropping calls and the phone system constantly resetting. Is VOIP really ready for such practices as to allow business to totally rely on VOIP in this matter?
I think you're asking the wrong question: Is low-cost commidity wireless networking ready to support delay and jitter critical applications? I think the answer is no.
Current thread:
- RE: QOS or more bandwidth, (continued)
- RE: QOS or more bandwidth Ukyo Kuonji (May 29)
- RE: QOS or more bandwidth Pete Kruckenberg (May 29)
- Re: QOS or more bandwidth Sean M. Doran (May 29)
- Re: QOS or more bandwidth RJ Atkinson (May 29)
- RE: QOS or more bandwidth Sean M. Doran (May 29)
- RE: QOS or more bandwidth Irwin Lazar (May 29)
- Re: QOS or more bandwidth bmanning (May 29)
- RE: QOS or more bandwidth RJ Atkinson (May 29)
- RE: QOS or more bandwidth Bill Woodcock (May 29)
- RE: QOS or more bandwidth Eric Whitehill (May 29)
- RE: QOS or more bandwidth Greg Maxwell (May 29)
- Re: QOS or more bandwidth Glen Turner (May 31)
- RE: QOS or more bandwidth Ukyo Kuonji (May 29)
- RE: QOS or more bandwidth Pete Kruckenberg (May 29)
- More BW, Less Taxes bmanning (May 29)
- Re: More BW, Less Taxes Simon Lockhart (May 29)
- Re: More BW, Less Taxes Alex Rubenstein (May 29)
- Re: More BW, Less Taxes Albert Meyer (May 29)
- Re: More BW, Less Taxes bmanning (May 29)