nanog mailing list archives
RE: QOS or more bandwidth
From: Irwin Lazar <ILazar () tbg com>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 08:15:38 -0600
FWIW, I recently heard someone ask the question - "how do you go to your investors and tell them you need more money for more bandwidth because you don't want to efficiently manage your existing capacity?" This is the business case for QoS, IMHO. Irwin -----Original Message----- From: Sean Donelan [mailto:sean () donelan com] Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 2:18 AM To: nanog () merit edu Subject: QOS or more bandwidth While its generally more effective to add more bandwidth than rationing it with QOS, with the recent downturn in capital markets will QOS become more popular? If your budget for bandwidth has been cut, I'm not sure people will have any budget for QOS either. But what QOS features are included in the standard product offerings?
Current thread:
- Re: QOS or more bandwidth, (continued)
- Re: QOS or more bandwidth Stephen J. Wilcox (May 29)
- Re: QOS or more bandwidth E.B. Dreger (May 29)
- Re: QOS or more bandwidth Stephen J. Wilcox (May 29)
- Re: QOS or more bandwidth Pete Kruckenberg (May 29)
- Re: QOS or more bandwidth Stephen J. Wilcox (May 29)
- RE: QOS or more bandwidth Pete Kruckenberg (May 29)
- Re: QOS or more bandwidth RJ Atkinson (May 29)
- Re: QOS or more bandwidth bmanning (May 29)
- RE: QOS or more bandwidth RJ Atkinson (May 29)
- RE: QOS or more bandwidth Bill Woodcock (May 29)
- RE: QOS or more bandwidth Eric Whitehill (May 29)
- RE: QOS or more bandwidth Greg Maxwell (May 29)
- Re: QOS or more bandwidth Glen Turner (May 31)
- RE: QOS or more bandwidth Pete Kruckenberg (May 29)