nanog mailing list archives
RE: QOS or more bandwidth
From: Irwin Lazar <ILazar () tbg com>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 08:51:16 -0600
FWIW, I recently heard someone ask the question - "how do you go to your investors and tell them you need more money for more bandwidth because you don't want to efficiently manage your existing capacity?" This is the business case for QoS, IMHO. Irwin
Which costs more, wholesale, raw bitpipes or qualified engineering talent to create/police the policies needed to maintain QoS? --bill That's the $64k question. :-)
Current thread:
- RE: QOS or more bandwidth, (continued)
- RE: QOS or more bandwidth Irwin Lazar (May 29)
- Re: QOS or more bandwidth bmanning (May 29)
- RE: QOS or more bandwidth RJ Atkinson (May 29)
- RE: QOS or more bandwidth Bill Woodcock (May 29)
- RE: QOS or more bandwidth Eric Whitehill (May 29)
- RE: QOS or more bandwidth Greg Maxwell (May 29)
- Re: QOS or more bandwidth Glen Turner (May 31)
- RE: QOS or more bandwidth Irwin Lazar (May 29)
- RE: QOS or more bandwidth Pete Kruckenberg (May 29)
- More BW, Less Taxes bmanning (May 29)
- Re: More BW, Less Taxes Simon Lockhart (May 29)
- Re: More BW, Less Taxes Alex Rubenstein (May 29)
- Re: More BW, Less Taxes Albert Meyer (May 29)
- Re: More BW, Less Taxes bmanning (May 29)
- Re: More BW, Less Taxes Simon Lockhart (May 29)
- Re: More BW, Less Taxes bmanning (May 29)
- Re: More BW, Less Taxes Simon Lockhart (May 29)
- Re: More BW, Less Taxes RJ Atkinson (May 29)