nanog mailing list archives
Re: More BW, Less Taxes
From: Alex Rubenstein <alex () nac net>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 23:57:09 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
Why does BW cost so much?My personal feeling is "because people pay the price". This can be seen
I think at some point in the not-so-distant future, we are going to reach a point where it can't get cheaper. Why? Well, simply, there is an actual, fixed cost as to how much it costs to provide the service, such as: a) dig, b) lay fiber, c) light the fiber, d) pay for muxes, e) have people to build it, manage it, fix it, and monitor it. The only correlative to this is that you will be able to do more with less, but we're bumping our heads on the 40 channels of OC192 these days, and will for a while.
Current thread:
- RE: QOS or more bandwidth, (continued)
- RE: QOS or more bandwidth Bill Woodcock (May 29)
- RE: QOS or more bandwidth Eric Whitehill (May 29)
- RE: QOS or more bandwidth Greg Maxwell (May 29)
- Re: QOS or more bandwidth Glen Turner (May 31)
- RE: QOS or more bandwidth Pete Kruckenberg (May 29)
- More BW, Less Taxes bmanning (May 29)
- Re: More BW, Less Taxes Simon Lockhart (May 29)
- Re: More BW, Less Taxes Alex Rubenstein (May 29)
- Re: More BW, Less Taxes Albert Meyer (May 29)
- Re: More BW, Less Taxes bmanning (May 29)
- Re: More BW, Less Taxes Simon Lockhart (May 29)
- Re: More BW, Less Taxes bmanning (May 29)
- Re: More BW, Less Taxes Simon Lockhart (May 29)
- Re: More BW, Less Taxes RJ Atkinson (May 29)