nanog mailing list archives

Re: product liability (was 'we should all be uncomfortable with the extent to which luck..')

From: David Charlap <david.charlap () marconi com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 10:54:51 -0400


William Allen Simpson wrote:


Also, you may have noticed that shrink-wrap licenses are valid in
only two places: Washington (state) and Virginia.  This would be a
Federal class action.


Didn't the Digital Millennium Copyright Act make shrink-wrap licenses
valid nation-wide?

-- David

Current thread:

RE: product liability (was 'we should all be uncomfortable with t he extent to which luck..') Roeland Meyer (Jul 25)
- RE: product liability (was 'we should all be uncomfortable with t he extent to which luck..') Daniel Senie (Jul 25)
- Re: product liability (was 'we should all be uncomfortable with the extent to which luck..') William Allen Simpson (Jul 25)
  - Re: product liability (was 'we should all be uncomfortable with the extent to which luck..') David Charlap (Jul 25)
    - Re: product liability (was 'we should all be uncomfortable with the extent to which luck..') William Allen Simpson (Jul 25)
    - Re: product liability (was 'we should all be uncomfortable with the extent to which luck..') Miles Fidelman (Jul 25)
    - Re: product liability (was 'we should all be uncomfortable with theextent to which luck..') William Allen Simpson (Jul 25)