nanog mailing list archives

Re: product liability (was 'we should all be uncomfortable with the extent to which luck..')


From: Miles Fidelman <mfidelman () civicnet org>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 11:33:08 -0400 (EDT)


On Wed, 25 Jul 2001, William Allen Simpson wrote:

David Charlap wrote:

William Allen Simpson wrote:

Also, you may have noticed that shrink-wrap licenses are valid in
only two places: Washington (state) and Virginia.  This would be a
Federal class action.

Didn't the Digital Millennium Copyright Act make shrink-wrap licenses
valid nation-wide?

No.  

You are thinking of last year's electronic signatures act -- an act that 
has no signatures, merely "sound, symbol, or process".

You're thinking of UCITA - the proposed revisions to the Universal
Commercial Code. These WOULD make shrink wrap licenses a lot more
powerful and painful.

The good news is that UCITA has to be enacted state-by-state, and an
increasing number of big players (e.g. large, corporate software buyers)
are lining up against UCITA.


**************************************************************************
The Center for Civic Networking             PO Box 600618
Miles R. Fidelman, President &              Newtonville, MA 02460-0006
Director, Municipal Telecommunications 
Strategies Program                          617-558-3698 fax: 617-630-8946
mfidelman () civicnet org                           http://civic.net/ccn.html

Information Infrastructure: Public Spaces for the 21st Century 
Let's Start With: Internet Wall-Plugs Everywhere 
Say It Often, Say It Loud: "I Want My Internet!" 
**************************************************************************


Current thread: